William Blake

This blog is presented by Austin Schwartz, Erika Hewgley, Veronica Sanchez, and MJ Roy.

Reading Response 3

An Eye Opener to William Blake and His Works
by MJ Roy
      In the article “Point of View and Context in Blake’s Songs”, Robert F. Gleckner reveals the secrets within romantic poet William Blake’s works, and teaches the reader how to recognize the true meaning of all Blake’s songs. Robert talks about using point of view, context, symbols, organization, and perspective to discover the true meaning of Blake’s poems. He demonstrates how to properly understand a poem by using these concepts in examples of Blake’s work. In My Pretty Rose Tree, Robert exposes the true reason why the speaker gets no reward from his “rose tree”, and teaches how the use of symbolism can make all poems easier to interpret. When Robert compares the Piper and the Bard (two characters within Blake’s works from Songs of Innocence and Songs of Experience), he displays the use of experience versus innocence, and tells how Blake uses those dualities in all his poems to intensify the irony and significance. He also reveals that all of Blake’s songs should be read in the correct order of Songs of Innocence then Songs of Experience. To explain this Robert writes, “For the serious reader of Blake’s songs, then a constant awareness of the context of state in which a poem appears in indispensable; and since each state is made up of many poems, the other poem in that state must be consulted to grasp the full significance of any one poem.” By this he means that William Blake intended his songs to be read, and remembered in a certain order. If someone reads a random poem from one of Blake’s songs, without any background information, that person would be unable to find the deeper meaning Blake hoped to expose. Throughout the article Robert shows the reader piece by piece how to better understand Blake’s songs, using very vital concepts, he backs all of his teachings up with examples, and information from other authors.
      Robert’s techniques really helped me to understand not only the poems, but also William Blake himself. Because of him I now know how to properly annotate and understand poems, so I actually learn from Blake. I never realized the amount of irony contained in his works, and positively didn’t understand it; his ironic occurrences in poems are similar to jokes, extremely hard to understand if all the background information isn’t known. In the article Robert demonstrated how to detect metaphors and characters within each poem, which helped me to understand what Blake was truly trying to portray in My Pretty Rose Tree from Songs of Experience:

A flower was offered to me,
Such a flower as May never bore;
But I said "I've a pretty rose tree,"
And I passed the sweet flower o'er.

Then I went to my pretty rose tree,
To tend her by day and by night;
But my rose turned away with jealousy,
And her thorns were my only delight.

It would be difficult to decipher this poem if the context, point of view, and symbols were not understood. Before I read Robert’s article, I thought the poem was about a person that was really into flowers. Fortunately I now understand how to interpret the poem. To begin I realized the “flower” is a woman (a temptress), and the “pretty rose tree” is the speaker’s wife. Replacing those symbols alone helps to read the poem. The speaker (a man) is temped by a beautiful woman to commit adultery, yet the man resists the temptation and goes home to be with his wife. Still even though he resisted said temptation, his wife left him because of jealousy. In order to understand why the man's virtuous act of faithfulness had such unfortunate consequences I had to comprehend Blake’s definition of virtue. To Blake ‘virtue’ can mean two different things, depending on the perspective. Blake wrote in two different contexts, he wrote in Songs of Innocence and Songs of Experience; these two different works define the meaning of the poems inside them. My Pretty Rose Tree was taken from Songs of Experience, from that knowledge alone, I understand that someone in the poem will either be a symbol of experience or learn a lesson in experience. William Blake saw that without breaking the 10 commandments, virtue could not exist. He believed Jesus (in biblical times) acted from impulse, and not rules, and Jesus was all virtue. Concluding that a person of experience, in order to be virtuous, would have to act solely from impulse. In My Pretty Rose Tree the speaker acts from rules, the rule (commandment) “Thou shall not commit adultery”, by refusing the offer of the other woman (sweet flower). Even though the man was faithful to his rose, he still has the same consequence from his wife as he would have if he wasn’t faithful and had seized the opportunity. In Blake’s eyes the poem is a lesson, an example of the known Latin phrase “carpe diem” (seize the day). One who ties himself to a joy will kill the essence of initial happiness. Living in the moment and rejoicing that one was able to take part in the happiness at all leaves more room to enjoy other happy experiences. The speaker passed up a chance of initial joy, to return home to his rose; thus the speaker did not ‘seize the day’. In doing this, the man lost a chance for experience. Without knowing the point of view and context while reading My Pretty Rose Tree, I was unable to comprehend the meaning. Robert taught me to understand that in all of Blake’s writing there are multiple purposes within an individual poem (song), and these must be recognized in order for the poem to be properly understood the way Blake wished the message to be comprehended. Robert also gave me the gift of being able to accept romantic poetry, and appreciate it. I actually have a favorite poem now, Holy Thursday from Songs of Innocence. I like this song because I understand it, and it is not just a blob of complex words and confusing punctuation. Thanks to Robert F. Gleckner, I have ironically learned a lesson from this poem that I once dreaded. 
    



Reading Response 3
by Austin Schwartz
      The Songs of Innocence and of Experience by William Blake express a minority’s thoughts and feelings toward the world’s status-quoi beliefs. Christine Gallant of Georgia State University sheds light on William Blake’s hidden motives and inklings about his beliefs toward the enslaved world in her article “Blake’s Antislavery Designs for Songs of Innocence and of Experience.” Gallant discerns Blake’s concern toward the ironic abolitionists who seek to end slavery yet maintain racist ethos. The depictions and artistry that is seen throughout the songs are at times more powerful than the written word in the poems in suggesting this twisted mindset. Gallant mainly focuses on the art throughout the Songs to interpret and explain Blake’s criticism and opposition to slavery but also the hypocritical evangelical abolitionists. Undisputed as the best works from Blake, the Songs are to be considered a beacon of truth to the world of slavery and the war that occurs inside oneself. Gallant states trying to uncover Blake’s real motives, “over and over, Blake emphasizes the Biblical point that man was created “in the image of God,” a sly reminder to those of a missionary bent that the “divine image” comes in many colors.”
            Reading Gallant’s article can only spark a person’s interest. As you go along and read her journey of digging and searching and demystifying Blake’s most profound works, you come to realize the truth that can be found in his words. This man was horribly confused, his own faith becoming irresolute. Gallant lays the foundation to Blake’s work by sharing the history of both the Haitian Revolution and the Saint-Domingue revolt. Believed to be Blake’s inspiration, the revolutions are the base for Blake’s poems and artistry. The conflict in England was between the proslavery community, which was clearly the majority, and the evangelical abolitionists. Blake indicates his dilemma in his poetry when the pronounced evangelical groups who insist on sharing the Word of God to the black slaves, yet show no resistance to those who enforce slavery. Gallant states in her article, “over and over, Blake emphasizes the Biblical point that man was created “in the image of God,” a sly reminder to those of a missionary bent that the “divine image” comes in many colors." I found myself while reading this article wishing I could have lived along side a man that was so full of truth and understanding of the world around him. I can only imagine his frustration with the entire situation that fell upon his country.  I am a Christian of faith and it would be terrifying to see my fellow Christians ignore what they are seeing with their own eyes.  Gallant states over and over the pain that Blake feels and how it took the two revolutions to ignited his heart and begin voicing for what he thought was right. I feel there is never a time to discriminate toward our own race. WWII, Asian Refugee Camps after Pearl Harbor, example’s of the horrific actions we as humans can harbor over ourselves. We cannot continue to let this conflict break us apart.
            Gallant digs deeper into decoding a specific illustration, one that is found within the poem, “The Little Black Boy.” The image can be described as two young boys, one of white color and one of black, near a savior figure. The young white boy is kneeling, considered being in the same posture as the Wedgwood Slave-Seal. The Wedgwood Slave-Seal was simply a symbol created by Josiah Wedgwood in association with the Abolitionists Society. The irony is then displayed as the white boy kneels in the “slave-like” posture, as the black boy tends to the smoothing of the white boy’s hair while standing. The savior focuses all attention on the white boy, excluding the black boy. Gallant makes the astounding interpretation of Blake’s work by stating, “in other words, it is the white boy who is the slave, with the “mind forg’d manacles” that prevent him from loving the black boy so unlike him.” I stand in amazement every time I read this sentence by Gallant. The irony that the many who forced enslavement upon so many black humans were actually the one’s missing out on a wonderful harmonious life. The white race was actually the enslaved race. Gallant all throughout her article expounded Blake’s illustrations and brought to light his underlining thoughts. I believe whole heartedly what Blake was trying to covey through his poetry during that appalling time. I have found a new appreciation for not just what Blake wrote about, but what all romantics believed and transcribed through their poetry.